_Jane Eyre_ is the history of British literature as a classic masterpieces, it successfully portrays the history of British literature in the first to love, life, society and religion are independent and proactive attitude and dare to struggle, dare to fight for freedom and equality of women image.
All the women who love foreign literary works like to read Charlotte's Jane Eyre. If we think that Charlotte writes Jane love only to write this lingering love. I think it's wrong. The author is also a woman, living in the middle of the nineteenth Century in the fluctuating UK, when thought had a new start. And the most permeated in Jane Eyre is this idea - the independent consciousness of women. Let us imagine that if Jane's independence has long been strangled in Jirenlixia childhood life; if she does not have the independence, she had and his wife and daughter live together in Rochester, began to have money, and status of new life; if she does not share of purity, we are now in the hands of _Jane Eyre_ is no longer touching the tears of the classic. So, I began to think about why Jane Eyre moved us and loved it - it was her independent character and the charm of her heart.
However, we can not help but ask, is this only one step to be independent? I don't think it is. After all, the independence of women is a long process, not overnight. It needs a thorough courage, like Jane then decided to leave Rochester, _the wind rustling Xi Zhuang earth went to the Yi River is so cold, did not return_ bold and daring. I think this should be the most critical step, and it should be a decisive step towards independence. Charlotte's Jane Eyre has left her stubborn character and independent personality to us. So she is a successful, happy woman.
_Jane Eyre_ this novel, shaped the maintenance of independent personality, the pursuit of individual freedom, advocate equality, do not yield to the fate of women, mainly wrote Jane Eyre and Mr. Rochester between twists and turns of love story. The heroine Jane Eyres parents died, living in an environment that ruthlessly trampled on her dignity, but this did not change Jane Eyres infinite confidence and unyielding spirit.
Jane Eyre is sent to a boarding school, where she learns from her good friend Helen an inner strength - - patience. Jane Eyre came to Roche side, her integrity, noble make Rochester shocked, and his heart, Jane Eyre moved.
When they get married that day, Jane Eyre found Rochester has a wife, her pride was teased, she left Rochester with grief and love. In the end, Jane Eyre returned to Rochester and married him.
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”,it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way,but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person,both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister,whose parents went off when she was very young,and her aunt,the only relative she had,treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began,she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a mon person,just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything a reward of revolting the ruthleoppression,Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden.
There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner,Rochester,a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on,but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry,she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife,who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodineall the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand,however,she made up her mind to leave,because she didn’t want to betray her own principles,because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife,Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel,but frankly speaking,I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing,this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another,this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong ing with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story,but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates,you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother,in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more,this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself,there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude,but for Rochester,how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact,when Jane met Rochester for the first time,she scared his horse and made his heel strained,to a certain extent,which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning.
The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. After it,Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
Bronte, name of three English novelists, also sisters, whose works were world-famous in Victorian Times, have become beloved classics. The sisters Charlotte Bronte, Emily Bronte and Anne Bronte were born in Thornton, Yorkshire. Each sister had astonishing achievement that was praised and envied by others. Charlotte’s “Jane Eyre” was published first, in 1847. Anne’s “Agnes Grey” and Emily’s Wuthering Heights appeared a little was born in 1816 and died in 1855. As her most famous works, Jane Eyre’s popularity has never waned and remained a passionate expression of female issues and concerns.
读《简爱》最深的感受是，这是一部充满人性化的作品，写的是一位饱经沧桑的女性在生活中获取的经验和心境，它在传达现实生活的追求和向往上体现了对困厄和孤独的抗挣。表现出那时英国女性对现实生活的迷茫，孤独和恐惧，蕴涵着穿行于冰冷物质空间人们对真情与温情的渴望，显示出别样的精神价值。19世纪的英国同样是一个金钱至上的社会，故事情节的开始就展现出简凄惨，可怜的身世，没有父母，唯一疼爱自己的舅舅也离她而去。天生叛逆的她在本是快乐的童年生活中充满了反抗，在残酷的现实生活中，她幼小的心在渴望温暖和真情，寻找本属于自己的一点一滴。
迷惑在进行，反抗在进行，寻找也在进行，在里德夫人和约翰的欺凌下，简终于走进了教会学堂。但伤痛是存在的，有许多本质的东西，有许多隐藏在生活潜流下的痛感仍需要面对。生活的困境，好友的离去，还有来自勃洛克赫斯特先生当众的痛斥都让她在迷惑的生活中感觉空气的污浊和心的'疼痛。生活总算是有了进展，上帝也发了些许的慈悲，在教会学堂两年的教师生活对于简或许是平静的死水一般。然而在不是欢快，沉静的生活中，却渗透着她强烈的孤独感和恐惧感，她需要的是在现实生活的困惑中去游离和奔波，获得自由，欢快和爱情。她唯一忘记的是那令她害怕的盖次海德府，她对它如此的恐惧。
恐惧使她远离了“幸福”，但也正是因为有了恐惧，她才会有所爱，有所无畏，尤其是对女性而言，恐惧的感情往往与温情，与人性的善良直接的相联。在追求自己的生活中，简渴望温情和善良，在死水般阴暗的生活中，简终于迈出了自己的脚步来到了罗切斯特先生的府邸。在那里她深切的感受到了女仆的和蔼，孩子的天真，还有罗切斯特先生炽烈的爱意。在那里她的灵魂终于驻足，然而这又是那样的短暂，在一个对爱坚信会使不信仰神的民族信奉上帝的爱人面前，她们美丽的爱情却在顷刻间化成了泡影，残酷的现实和社会的压力让这个灰姑娘找不到方向，在心的破碎和情的毁灭中，她又开始了自己迷茫的生活，在无际的世界中寻找他方。
钱是没有的，爱是没有的，而生活却是现实的，沿街的乞讨让简仍在寻找善良和真情。在风雨中，与圣约翰的相逢则是她新生活的又一个开始。在和玛利，黛安娜共同生活的那段时间内，她深切的感受到了爱的温暖。当她知道她们又是一个血统时，她的心兴奋的几乎要跳出来，在圣约翰那不知是否能称得上爱的面前，简每天都希望能满足他的期望，但是这样，她感觉自己抛掉了天性，失去了自我。在继承叔叔的遗产去平分时，她是那样的果断和坚定，而在此刻，圣约翰的企求下，她开始了徘徊，因为她自己知道她对罗切斯特先生的思念一刻也没有停止过。
对生活追求的信念在简看来不是阳光所能驱散的雾气；也不是画在沙滩上的人像能被暴风雨所冲掉；它是一个刻在大理石碑上的名字，注定要和石碑同生共死。圣约翰先生的期望在继续，叛逆的简在亲情，恩情和爱情中犹豫和思考。她深切的知道他爱她就像士兵爱一件好武器，仅此而已。简的灵魂在心里回答，去做一件正确的事，完成上帝的旨意，以冲出怀疑的云雾，找到确定的广阔天空。
终于，简又开始了最后的找寻，面对着灰飞湮灭的昔日庄园，周围一片死一般的寂静，孤寂，荒凉，和凄切。而此刻充溢于简灵魂的是无尽的害怕和思念。古老的建筑深深地隐藏在一座树林里。芬丁庄园沐浴在凉气透骨的绵绵细雨中，而失明的罗切斯特先生却在户外焦急的等待。平静的生活和无尽的思念或许是他灵魂飞扬的源泉，就在这简单的生活中，简和他紧紧的相拥，似温馨迷人的梦，美好而又实在。在烦躁的生活中，时间让简彻底的找到了属于自己的生活，在树林的古建筑里和爱人平淡的度过每一天的生活。
光阴是短暂的，又是美好的，已逝的岁月里简和心爱的人共同面对生活中的一切，她们也彻底的成为了彼此的骨中骨，肉中肉。故事结束了，而真实的，毫不含糊的现实生活却在你我的心中演绎。征程的坎坷，旅途的疲惫，生活的曲折，拼搏的寂寞萦绕在心头，而怀抱里的各种志愿却在风雨中愈发的不可动摇。面对阳光，面对风雨，你是否如此地坦然；面对理想，面对希望，你是否执着地追求！在简平凡而又曲折的生活中，她时刻放飞着美丽的梦想，为幸福而追求，为平凡而找寻。她别样的精神价值在新的时代里赋予了青年们幸福与快乐的真谛——在深深树林中的一座古老建筑里有一对白发苍苍的老人感受着上帝的恩赐和彼此的温暖，或许这就是生活的幸福。
Oliver Twist, one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’, is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.
The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.
The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist, an orphan, who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime. He suffered enormous pain, such as hunger, thirst, beating and abuse. While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver, I was shocked by his sufferings. I felt for the poor boy, but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill. To my relief, as was written in all the best stories, the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end. One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft, little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs. Maylie and Rose and began a new life. He went for walks with them, or Rose read to him, and he worked hard at his lessons. He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.
How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind? The reason is the nature of goodness. I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty. Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent, yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.
For me, the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person. Goodness is to humans what water is to fish. He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person. On the contrary, as the famous saying goes, ‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’, he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person. People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done, and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.
To my disappointment, nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity. They look down on people’s honesty and kindness, thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted. As a result, they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others. On the other hand, they attach importance to money and benefit. In their opinion, money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility. If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’, they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down. They are one of the sorts that I really detest.
Francis Bacon said in his essay, ‘Goodness, of all virtues and dignities of the mind, is the greatest, being the character of the Deity, and without it, man is a busy, mischievous, wretched thing, no better than a kind of vermin.’
That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything. Therefore, I, a kind person, want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.
This is a story about a special and unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. The story can be interpreted as a symbol of the independent spirit.
It seems to me that many readers’ English reading experience starts with Jane Eyer. I am of no exception. As we refer to the movie “Jane Eyer”, it is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both physically and mentally.
Jane Eyer was a born resister, whose parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag. Since Jane’s education in Lowwood Orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. The suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach Jane to be persevering and prize dignity over anything a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, Jane got a chance to be a tutor in Thornfield Garden. There she made the acquaintance of lovely Adele and that garden’s owner, Rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. Jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: After Jane and Rochester fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact Rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow following Rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----Rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. Jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want to betray her own principles, because she was Jane Eyer. The film has finally got a symbolist end: Jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned. After finding Rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, Jane chose to stay with him forever.
I don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, I would rather regard the section that Jane began her teaching job in Thornfield as the film’s end----especially when I heard Jane’s words “Never in my life have I been awaken so happily.” For one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life was what Jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. But the professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally different result: There must be something wrong coming with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of Jane’s life that “Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (By Forrest Gump’s mother, in the film “Forrest Gump”)
What’s more, this film didn’t end when Jane left Thornfield. For Jane Eyer herself, there should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering her fortitude, but for Rochester, how he can get salvation? The film gives the answer tentatively: Jane eventually got back to Rochester. In fact, when Jane met Rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant Rochester would get retrieval because of Jane. We can consider Rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. The fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life.
After it, Rochester got the mercy of the God and the love of the woman whom he loved. Here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides. The value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of religion.
Life is ceaselessly changing, but our living principles remain. Firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. In the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
In this era of rapid social and technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. We are likely to find ourselves bogged down in the Sargasso Sea of information overload and living unconsciousness. It’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.
Heart is the engine of body, brain is the resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. Indubitably, “Jane Eyer” is one of them.
Jane Eyre was published in 1847 under the androgynous pseudonym of “Currer Bell.” The publication was followed by widespread success. Utilizing two literary traditions， the Bildungsroman and the Gothic novel， Jane Eyre is a powerful narrative with profound themes concerning genders， family， passion， and identity. It is unambiguously one of the most celebrated novels in British literature.
Born in 1816， Charlotte Bronte was the third daughter of Patrick Bronte， an ambitious and intelligent clergyman. According to Newsman， all the Bronte children were unusually precocious and almost ferociously intelligent， and their informal and unorthodox educations under their father's tutelage nurtured these traits. Patrick Bronte shared his interests in literature with his children， toward whom he behaved as though they were his intellectual equals. The Bronte children read voraciously. Charlotte's imagination was especially fired by the poetry of Byron， whose brooding heroes served as the prototypes for characters in the Bronte's juvenile writings as well as for such figures as Mr. Rochester in Jane Eyre （2）。 Bronte's formal education was limited and sporadic – ten months at the age of 8 at Cowan Bridge Clergy Daughters' School （the model for Lowood Institution in Jane Eyre）， eighteen months from the age of 14 at Roe Head School of Miss Margaret Wooler （the model for Ms. Temple） （Nestor 3-4）。 According to Newman， Bronte then worked as a teacher at Roe Head for three years before going to work as a governess. Seeking an alternative way of earning money， Charlotte Bronte went to Brussels in 1842 to study French and German at the Pensionnat Heger， preparing herself to open a school at the parsonage. She seems to have fallen in love with her charismatic teacher， Constantin Heger. The experience seems on a probable source for a recurrent feature in Bronte's fiction: “relationships in which the inflammatory spark of intellectual energy ignites an erotic attraction between a woman and a more socially powerful man” （Newman 6）。 The Brontes' efforts to establish a school at the parsonage never got off the ground. Still seeking ways to make money， Charlotte published， with her sisters， the unsuccessful Poems by Currer， Ellis， and Acton Bell. Her first effort to publish a novel， The Professor， was also unsuccessful. Jane Eyre， published in October 1847， however， was met with great enthusiasm and became one of the best sellers. As “Currer Bell” Bronte pleted two more novels， Shirley and Villette. She married Reverend William Bell Nicholls in 1854 and died nine months later， at the age of thirty-nine in 1855 （Nestor 4-5）。
The story of Jane Eyre takes place in northern England in the early to mid-19th Century. （“Jane Eyre” 151） It starts as the ten-year-old Jane， a plain but unyielding child， is excluded by her Aunt Reed from the domestic circle around the hearth and bullied by her handsome but unpleasant cousins. Under the suggestion of Mr. Lloyd， an apothecary that sympathizes Jane， Mrs. Reed sends Jane to Lowood Institution operated by a hypocritical Evangelicalist， Mr. Brocklehurst， who chastises Jane in front of the class and calls her a liar. At Lowood， Jane befriends with Helen Burns， who helps the newly arrived Jane adjust to the austere environment; she is also taken under the wing of the superintendent， Miss Temple. One spring， many students catch typhus due to the harsh condition. Helen dies of consumption. At the end of her studies Jane is retained as a teacher. When Jane grows weary of her life at Lowood， she advertises for a position as governess and is engaged by Mrs. Fairfax， housekeeper at Thro,field， for a little girl， Adele Varens. After much waiting， Jane meets her employer， Edward Rochester， somber， moody， quick to change in his manner， and brusque in his speech. Mysterious happenings occur at Thronfield， including demonic laugh emanating from the third-story attic and a fire set in Rochester's bedroom one night. Rochester attributes all the oddities to Grace Poole， the seamstress. Meanwhile， Jane develops an attraction for Rochester. Rochester， however， often flirts with the idea of marrying Miss Ingram. An old acquaintance of Rochester's， Richard Mason， visits Thornfield and is severely injured from an attack apparently from Grace. Jane returns to Gateshead for a while to see the dying Mrs. Reed. When she returns to Thornfield， Rochester asks Jane to marry him. Jane accepts， but during the wedding， Mason and a solicitor interrupt the ceremony by revealing that Rochester is keeping his lunatic wife， Bertha Mason， in the attic in Thornfield. Despite Rochester's confession， Jane leaves Thornfield. She arrives at the desolate crossroads of Whitcross and runs into the Rivers siblings， who tend her in Moor House. Jane happily accepts the offer of teaching at St. John's school.
